By ChatGPT: AfD state election scenario - drivers, counterforces and consequences
Kai Neumann (#1) has provided a description of the model with the iMODELER Presenter.
Description
Done. I created the .imm model using your example file as the structural template.
Download the iMODELER model – AfD state election scenario (.imm)
It contains 42 factors and 55 weighted connections, consistently using 10 = weak, 20 = medium, 30 = strong. I separated three parts of the model visually: drivers of an AfD electoral victory, factors that could prevent/reduce it, and possible consequences.
Importantly, the central factor is “AfD becomes largest party in state election”, with a separate downstream factor “AfD leads or participates in state government.” That distinction is particularly relevant to the current elections: Mecklenburg-Vorpommern and Berlin vote on 20 September 2026, and current polling in Mecklenburg-Vorpommern has the AfD around 36% and clearly in first place, while coalition arithmetic could nevertheless keep it out of government.
Among the strongest drivers in the model are dissatisfaction with government, perceived lack of control over migration, protest/change voting, issue ownership on migration/security, low institutional trust, and weakness/fragmentation of competing parties. Counterforces include credible solutions on migration/security, satisfaction with government, economic improvement, trusted competing candidates, turnout among non-AfD voters, strategic voting, concern about AfD policies, and AfD campaign mistakes.
I also built in some feedback loops, for example electoral success → greater organizational resources/normalization → greater credibility in later elections, and electoral success → counter-mobilization → higher turnout among opponents. That should make the Insight Matrix / impact analysis in iMODELER considerably more interesting than a simple tree.